Juicers have come a long way since they were first introduced. This is due in part to the laws of supply and demand. More and more of us are trying to adopt healthier lifestyles, and juicing can be a big part of that by giving us a way to get more veggie and fruit nutrition into our diets without having to rely on expensive commercially prepared juices that often have artificial ingredients added to them for flavor and/or color improvement. Manufacturers have seized on this increased consumer demand to create an extensive, and often confusing, supply of machines designed to fit the needs and budgets of those in the market for a new juicer. You can make the process of choosing your best juicer easier by understanding how different types of juicers work and which type is most likely to match your different needs.
Among general purpose juicers, masticating juicers (also called slow-press or cold-press juicers) are typically going to produce the highest yield of juice from the most varied selection of produce. Named after the same process that we use for chewing our food, masticating juicers press and grind your produce with an auger. The juice drains through a screen into its own container while the pulp gets left behind. The higher juice yield does usually come with a higher price tag and a slower process, but many who’ve tried juice from both masticating and centrifugal juicers (we’ll talk about them below) report that the juice from masticating models just seems to taste better. This could be because the slower pressing doesn’t allow as much air to be introduced into the juice (a process called oxidation). Also, remember that getting a higher yield of juice means that the higher purchase price can save you money down the road by allowing you to get more juice from less produce. If you’re considering a masticating juicer as a way to help you with planning a nutritious weekly diet, this site will give you pros and cons of a varied selection of slow press models.
Triturating juicers are a newer juicer type and work in the same manner as masticating juicers but add a second auger. The augers work together for an even greater level of extraction. In addition to being more expensive than single-auger juicers, triturating models are slower and can be more difficult to clean, things to keep in mind if you find yourself leaning in their direction.
Centrifugal juicers work by chopping and spinning fruits and vegetables to extract the juice from the pulp. These models are among the least expensive and the quickest, but don’t produce quite as much juice as masticating versions. Lower-end centrifugal juicers tend to be the poorest overall performers when it comes to both quantity of juice produced and effectively juicing the largest variety of produce. In addition to the lower price tag, some folks are drawn to the lighter weight construction if they know the juicer will have to be moved around frequently (such as from a cabinet to the counter and back again).
There are a number of websites that claim that juicing, especially with centrifugal models, heats the juice to a point that destroys all of the beneficial nutrients and enzymes, thereby negating all of the juice’s nutrition benefits. Actually, though, it takes prolonged exposure to temperatures well over 100 degrees Fahrenheit before this happens, and no juicers raise the juice temp by anywhere near that much, so don’t let that anti-juicing bit of hype concern you.
Visit how to make a healthy drink for reviews of several models and types, including those designed for commercial use. You’ll find top picks from different categories and top manufacturers.
Check out http://bestjuicer.reviews/jack-lalanne-power for info on some of the Jack LaLanne line of juicers as well as a little info on the amazing man who became known as the godfather of modern fitness, using the principles of healthy eating and regular exercise to inspire countless people to get and stay fit. Practicing what he preached allowed him to stay exceedingly healthy and active right up until his death at the age of 96.